Lars Delhage wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 18:26, Andreas Steffen wrote:
> > Currently you cannot have more then one secret key definition
> > of the form
> >
> > : RSA {...} or : RSA <filename> ["<passphrase>"]
> >
> > without specified endpoints. But you could have additional
> > secret keys of the form
> >
> > <peer id> <my id> : RSA {...} or
> > <peer id> <my id> : RSA <filename> ["<passphrase>"]
> >
> > which would match the RSA connection.
> >
> Is it possible to use "any" or something as the peer id so that I can
> have several such lines with a "catch all" at the end?
>
I don't know since I have never tried it :-(
> Cheers,
> Lars
> --
> Lars Delhage, Nohup AB
> tel: +46-(0)8-458 78 15, fax: +46-(0)8-612 55 03
> http://www.nohup.se
> GnuPG fingerprint: 4E08 4F49 213A 0B38 95AF 0F65 B77B B16B 5694 92FE
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Name: signature.asc
> signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature
> Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Regards
Andreas
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH phone: +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Zürichweg 20 home: http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
==========================================[strong internet security]==
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:42 CEST