Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto 1.95 crashes

From: D. Hugh Redelmeier (hugh_at_mimosa.com)
Date: Thu Mar 14 2002 - 22:22:38 CET

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] x509 gateway to gateway"
Previous message: freeswan cybermaus: "[Users] Re: compile on 2.0.39, giving up?"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto 1.95 crashes"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto 1.95 crashes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

| From: Bryan Bayerdorffer <bryan.bayerdorffer_at_analog.com>
|
| 1.95 from debian package, custom 2.4.17 (also tried .18) kernel. 1.95 was
| running ok with 2.4.17 before upgrading from debian stable to unstable. library
| incomaptibility?

I don't recognize this bug. I also don't recognize the source: the
assertion failed in a line that isn't in 1.95. I am guessing that the
reason is that you are using the X.509 patch. So I guess that this is
one for Andreas.

A core dump might help. So too a barf.

Hugh Redelmeier
hugh_at_mimosa.com voice: +1 416 482-8253

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] x509 gateway to gateway"
Previous message: freeswan cybermaus: "[Users] Re: compile on 2.0.39, giving up?"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto 1.95 crashes"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto 1.95 crashes"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:42 CEST