Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] x.509 and net-to-net

From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com)
Date: Mon Mar 18 2002 - 22:15:14 CET

Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN stops responding on one end."
Previous message: norbert wegener: "Re: [Users] Routing problems when FreeS/WAN is not default gateway for leftsubnetservers."
In reply to: Ingo Bruell: "[Users] x.509 and net-to-net"
Next in thread: Ingo Bruell: "Re[2]: [Users] x.509 and net-to-net"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Please read the fine mailing archive:

http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2002-March/008537.html

Regards

Andreas

Ingo Bruell wrote:

>Hi,
>
>is it possible to configure a net-to-net connection between to
>companies ?
>
>Could they each use own ca's and how it should be configured ?
>
>so long
>
>
>Ingo Bruell
>
>---
><ibruell_at_gmx.de>
><Ingo.Bruell_at_epost.de>
><ICQ# 40377720>
>Oldenburg PGP-Fingerprint: CB01 AE12 B359 87C4 BF1C 953C 8FE7 C648 169E E5FC
>Germany PGP-Public-Key available at pgpkeys.mit.edu
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
>http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>

Content Security by MailMarshal
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] FreeSWAN stops responding on one end."
Previous message: norbert wegener: "Re: [Users] Routing problems when FreeS/WAN is not default gateway for leftsubnetservers."
In reply to: Ingo Bruell: "[Users] x.509 and net-to-net"
Next in thread: Ingo Bruell: "Re[2]: [Users] x.509 and net-to-net"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:45 CEST