Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Freeswan on one physical network + RIP (zebra) ?

From: Mikael Lönnroth (mikael.lonnroth_at_advancevpn.com)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 07:28:20 CET

Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] Securing specific ports with freeswan"
Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] Cant pass traffic through the VPN?!?!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Greetings,

Is it possible to use a combination of Freeswan + Zebra to make a "one-armed" VPN network? (And is this indeed the right definition
of "one-armed"?)

Network A: 193.1.1.0/24 (VPN GW 193.1.1.2)
.
.
Router 193.1.1.1
.
.
Router 194.1.1.1
.
.
Network B: 194.1.1.0/24 (VPN GW 194.1.1.2)

Freeswan quite nicely brings up the tunnel between 193.1.1.2 and 194.1.1.2 (193.1.1.0/24 => 193.1.1.2 => 194.1.1.2 => 194.1.1.0/24),
but after this, it becomes a routing problem...

I guess all nodes on 193.1.1.0/24 should get these two additional routes: 194.1.1.2/32 ==> 193.1.1.1 and 194.1.1.0/24 ==> 193.1.1.2
... but how is that accomplished?

Anyone done this?

Regards,
Mikael Lönnroth

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] Securing specific ports with freeswan"
Previous message: Henry Spencer: "Re: [Users] Cant pass traffic through the VPN?!?!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:46 CEST