Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Upgrade 1.94 -> 1.96

From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: Tue Mar 26 2002 - 18:09:01 CET

Next message: Sandy Harris: "[Users] [Fwd: Re: talks about SE Linux]"
Previous message: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] help:"lack KLIPs""
In reply to: Wolfgang Powisch: "Re: [Users] Upgrade 1.94 -> 1.96"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Wolfgang Powisch wrote:
> > In general, no. The interface between the two is subject to change
> > without notice.
> >
> But when I've compiled KLIPS as module, changing the module should be
> enough ... is that correct ??

Yes, if the underlying kernel hasn't changed.

Henry Spencer
henry_at_spsystems.net

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Sandy Harris: "[Users] [Fwd: Re: talks about SE Linux]"
Previous message: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] help:"lack KLIPs""
In reply to: Wolfgang Powisch: "Re: [Users] Upgrade 1.94 -> 1.96"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:46 CEST