Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Freeswan implemenatation

From: George Hadjichristofi (ghadjich_at_adelphia.net)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 02:54:20 CEST

Next message: Administrator_at_mail.freeswan.org: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings matched and action taken."
Previous message: System Attendant: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken."
Next in thread: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] Freeswan implemenatation"
Reply: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] Freeswan implemenatation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

Is the freeswan implmentation a Bump in the Stack(BITS) implemenation, or is
it integrated into the OS at the network layer?

I always thought the second one was true.

Thank you

George

*************************************************
George C. Hadjichristofi
Graduate Student,Computer Engineering Department
Virginia Tech,Blacksburg,VA 24061,U.S.A
TEL:(540)-951-8936 FAX:(775)-361-1201
*************************************************

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Administrator_at_mail.freeswan.org: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient file blocking settings matched and action taken."
Previous message: System Attendant: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken."
Next in thread: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] Freeswan implemenatation"
Reply: Sandy Harris: "Re: [Users] Freeswan implemenatation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:52 CEST