Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Port 500 on VPN gateway not reachable

From: Teemu Torma (teemu_at_torma.org)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 12:44:09 CEST

Next message: Justin Hinderliter: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Previous message: System Attendant: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken."
In reply to: Gerhard Hofmann: "RE: [Users] Port 500 on VPN gateway not reachable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sunday 21 April 2002 07:37, Gerhard Hofmann wrote:
> Thanks for the hint. I will try nmap and keep in mind that it is UDP not
> TCP.
> What about ports 50, 51? Are these TCP or UDP? Should those be visible when
> doing a port scan?

They are protocol numbers, not ports. For a full list, see /etc/protocls.
There you can also see that TCP is number 6 and UDP is number 17.

Teemu

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Justin Hinderliter: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Previous message: System Attendant: "[Users] ScanMail Message: To Recipient virus found and action taken."
In reply to: Gerhard Hofmann: "RE: [Users] Port 500 on VPN gateway not reachable"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:52 CEST