Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel

From: Mrnokia (mrnokia_at_gmx.de)
Date: Sun Apr 21 2002 - 21:59:41 CEST

Next message: Tony Earnshaw: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Previous message: John D. Hardin: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Next in thread: John A. Sullivan III: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Reply: John A. Sullivan III: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello together, im using freeswan with the x509 patch it is running, when i do a Diagnose with sentinel ssh it says all ok, when making a vpn connection it says folowing in the messages log :
Apr 19 20:11:14 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: packet from 192.168.99.102:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload
Apr 19 20:11:14 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.99.102
Apr 19 20:11:15 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT
Apr 19 20:11:15 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: Peer ID is ID_DER_ASN1_DN: 'C=DE, O=Kool AG, CN=rw1'
Apr 19 20:11:15 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
Apr 19 20:11:15 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #27: responding to Quick Mode
Apr 19 20:11:16 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #27: IPsec SA established
Apr 19 20:11:16 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: ignoring Delete SA payload
Apr 19 20:11:16 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: received and ignored informational message
Apr 19 20:11:46 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: ignoring Delete SA payload
Apr 19 20:11:46 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #26: received and ignored informational message
Apr 19 20:11:56 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: packet from 192.168.99.102:500: ignoring Vendor ID payload
Apr 19 20:11:56 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #28: responding to Main Mode from unknown peer 192.168.99.102
Apr 19 20:11:57 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #28: ignoring informational payload, type IPSEC_INITIAL_CONTACT
Apr 19 20:11:57 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #28: Peer ID is ID_DER_ASN1_DN: 'C=DE, O=Kool AG, CN=rw1'
Apr 19 20:11:57 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #28: sent MR3, ISAKMP SA established
Apr 19 20:12:19 LxSrv1 Pluto[3437]: "rw1" 192.168.99.102 #28: Informational Exchange message for an established ISAKMP SA must be encrypted

What did it mean and what is wrong ?

Cu Sascha

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Tony Earnshaw: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Previous message: John D. Hardin: "Re: [Users] Damn worm"
Next in thread: John A. Sullivan III: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Reply: John A. Sullivan III: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Problems using freeswan an sentinel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:52 CEST