Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] could I connect with road warriors without x.509 ?

From: sohu (18800166_at_sohu.com)
Date: Wed Apr 24 2002 - 06:00:48 CEST

Next message: linux-ipsec: "*****SPAM***** [Users] 4/24/2002 12:06:21 AM"
Previous message: Justin Kreger: "RE: [Users] Linksys BEFVP41 router"
In reply to: 王萍: "[Users] could I connect with road warriors without x.509 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

authby the preshared key method
use win2000 self's ipsec tools
or by the SSHsentinel

----- Original Message -----
From: "王萍" <dana_wp1980_at_hotmail.com>
To: <users_at_lists.freeswan.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 4:55 PM
Subject: [Users] could I connect with road warriors without x.509 ?

> Hi:
> I have a frees/wan(1.95) gateway now,can I support road warriors without
> x.509 patch and certificate authentication?
> (I want the road warriors to run win2000.)
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: linux-ipsec: "*****SPAM***** [Users] 4/24/2002 12:06:21 AM"
Previous message: Justin Kreger: "RE: [Users] Linksys BEFVP41 router"
In reply to: 王萍: "[Users] could I connect with road warriors without x.509 ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:53 CEST