Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN 1.94 on Linux6.2 Server ?

From: Nate Carlson (natecars+freeswan_at_natecarlson.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 17:34:52 CEST

Next message: Jacques de VILLELE: "[Users] ipsec_auto: fatal error in "conn_name": %defaultroute requested but not known"
Previous message: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] Why does FreeSwan care about NAT? Was: Re: a "no suitable connection for peer" error"
In reply to: Arzoo Saher: "[Users] FreeS/WAN 1.94 on Linux6.2 Server ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, Arzoo Saher wrote:
>
> I am installing FreeS/WAN 1.94 on Linux6.2 Server with kernel
> Linux-2.2.20, but it is giving me errors during compile time of cant
> able to locate gmp.h, resolve.h ?
>
> What might be the reason and how can I remove it?

You will need to install the gmp-devel rpm, and glibc-devel, if you
haven't already installed it.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
| nate carlson | natecars_at_natecarlson.com |
| brainbench mvp for linux admin -- http://www.brainbench.com |
| Depriving some poor village of it's idiot since 1981 |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Jacques de VILLELE: "[Users] ipsec_auto: fatal error in "conn_name": %defaultroute requested but not known"
Previous message: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] Why does FreeSwan care about NAT? Was: Re: a "no suitable connection for peer" error"
In reply to: Arzoo Saher: "[Users] FreeS/WAN 1.94 on Linux6.2 Server ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:56 CEST