Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] REPOST : FreeS/WAN - Cisco

From: Mathieu DESPRIEE (mathieu.despriee_at_transatel.com)
Date: Fri Apr 26 2002 - 18:23:51 CEST

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: [Users] Virus in Mailinglist"
Previous message: Jacques de VILLELE: "[Users] ipsec_auto: fatal error in "conn_name": %defaultroute requested but not known"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is it possible to setup an IPsec tunnel just with authentication and no
encryption ??

M.D

attached mail follows:

Hi all

Freeswan is not inter-operable with a Cisco 2600 if this Cisco use the
DES algorithm for encryption.
The first soltuion to this problem is to ask the administrator of the
distant network to use (or certainly BUY) the 3DES module to set up the
VPN between us.
But : our need is principaly authentication not encryption. So, another
solution would be : to setup my freeswan and the distant cisco2600
router to not use encryption, but authentication only.

Is it possible ? Does anybody already made somethin like that ?

M.D
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Michael H. Warfield: "Re: [Users] Virus in Mailinglist"
Previous message: Jacques de VILLELE: "[Users] ipsec_auto: fatal error in "conn_name": %defaultroute requested but not known"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:56 CEST