> Seems the problem is not with freeswan. All the problems are related to
>IPSEC. IPSEC RFCs does NOT allow it to work when any of the machines are
>NAT'ed .......
>
> Sincerily,
> Leonardo Rodrigues
>
>----- Original Message -----
>>
>> I would think there are MANY people with NAT at home now, so it
>> strikes me as odd that FreeSwan doesn't work with this. Why should it
>> care anyway? Isn't supposed to accept any address on the right side?
> > How would x509 even be relevant?
Is this an April Fool's joke?
--Maurice Volaski, mvolaski_at_aecom.yu.edu Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users_at_lists.freeswan.org http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:56 CEST