Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

RE: [Users] automatic vs. manual keying

From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: Fri May 03 2002 - 15:37:30 CEST

Next message: Rafal Kustra: "[Users] Re: Loss of Connectivity"
Previous message: Josep Llauradó Selvas: "[Users] Problem configuring Win2k warrior"
In reply to: George Hadjichristofi: "RE: [Users] automatic vs. manual keying"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Fri, 3 May 2002, George Hadjichristofi wrote:
> Is the IKE used in manual keying?

No.

> When we use pre-shared keys does that imply manual keying?

No. Confused terminology; pre-shared keys are used to authenticate the
two ends to each other in automatic keying.

> When we use automatic keying is the "PSK" or "RSA" (stored in the
> ipsec.secrets file) used, or are those for manual keying?

They are the authentication method for automatic keying.

Henry Spencer
henry_at_spsystems.net

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Rafal Kustra: "[Users] Re: Loss of Connectivity"
Previous message: Josep Llauradó Selvas: "[Users] Problem configuring Win2k warrior"
In reply to: George Hadjichristofi: "RE: [Users] automatic vs. manual keying"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:57 CEST