Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

AW: Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?

From: Daniel Tombeil (dt_at_admindu.de)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 17:56:04 CEST

Next message: Brock Nanson: "RE: [Users] Slow Transfers Seen"
Previous message: Daniel Tombeil: "AW: [Users] SSH Sentinel V1.3 and Freeswan & Shorewall"
In reply to: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Next in thread: Keith Morse: "Re: AW: Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Reply: Keith Morse: "Re: AW: Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

> -----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
> Von: users-admin_at_lists.freeswan.org
> [mailto:users-admin_at_lists.freeswan.org] Im Auftrag von Richard Welty
> Gesendet: Montag, 6. Mai 2002 03:46

[...]

> generally good advice, although i will mention that FreeS/WAN
> 1.96 can be applied against redhat's 2.4.9-31 kernel source
> with correct results.

I'm running a RedHat-7.2 with a 2.4.9-31 kernel, FreeSwan 1.97
+ X.509 patch and netfilter without any problems.

Regards

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Brock Nanson: "RE: [Users] Slow Transfers Seen"
Previous message: Daniel Tombeil: "AW: [Users] SSH Sentinel V1.3 and Freeswan & Shorewall"
In reply to: Richard Welty: "Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Next in thread: Keith Morse: "Re: AW: Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Reply: Keith Morse: "Re: AW: Re[2]: [Users] Which a flavor to choose !!?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:57 CEST