Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Ipsec device max number???

From: Steve Elkins (sgelkins_at_nortelnetworks.com)
Date: Mon May 06 2002 - 19:36:36 CEST

Next message: Ramin Alidousti: "[Users] ipsec0 pointing to the underlying interface... [was: Routing and FreeS/WAN]"
Previous message: Mimmus: "[Users] Routing problem?"
In reply to: wrestle: "[Users] Ipsec device max number???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

"wrestle" <wrestle_at_sina.com> writes:

> Default, freeswan only support max number 4 ipsec device(ipsec0-3). But
> I want to make it support more devices, I change source:
> in ipsec_tunnel.h : #define IPSEC_NUM_IF 10
> in ipsec_tunnel.c : add dev_ipsec4 - 9 define and change function:
> ipsec_tunnel_init_device and ipsec_tunnel_cleanup_divices.
> Then, I rebuild kernel, and change ipsec.conf define. such as
> interface="ipsec5=eth4"
> Unlucky, It can not work properly.

While we're on the subject, I'm trying to make a traffic tool work
under FreeS/WAN so I need several hundred IPs aliased on the box.
I've done several (ipsec0:1, ipsec0:2, etc.) but haven't tried to
scale it up any further.

Has anyone else done such a thing?

Thanks,
Steve

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Ramin Alidousti: "[Users] ipsec0 pointing to the underlying interface... [was: Routing and FreeS/WAN]"
Previous message: Mimmus: "[Users] Routing problem?"
In reply to: wrestle: "[Users] Ipsec device max number???"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:57 CEST