-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Location 1: 192.168.3.0/24 masq 111.222.333.10 <-> 0/0 (tunnel:
111.222.333.10 <-> 0/0)
> Location 2: 192.168.5.0/24 masq 111.222.999.50 <-> 0/0 (tunnel:
111.222.999.50 <-> 0/0)
>
> What I'd like to add is this tunnel: 192.168.3.0/24 <-> 192.168.5.0/24
>
> While I suspect it will go off with out a hitch, I'm going to
> experiment in the office tomorrow first. Was wondering if anybody had
> done this (or similar) and if they ran in to any bumps in the road.
If you run into any trouble, be sure to explicitly exempt the packets
travelling from one 192.168.x network to the other from masquerading. That
way, they'll be sure to go in the correct tunnel.
Sam.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.
iQCVAwUBPNhTXkOSC4btEQUtAQGcggQAyySTPLSOgGHBlQqA5879CM1pogl2OjRp
IhqNkaZxgzGmlYXbD/uiy1tgtKYQVow/KHdVN3n0VUTNqcSJc5NHqKLbsMRDkIDf
4lwjAHzht960QaXw6wOlZ+i8x2Cn3I7DhD4DvK4e9uS/auHSqfMb8Fl9tzvIoiTy
kANVNcJoMfA=
=EXOa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:57 CEST