Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP

From: Teemu Torma (teemu_at_torma.org)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 16:09:23 CEST

Next message: Justin Kreger: "RE: [Users] FreeSWAN with kernel 2.4"
Previous message: Isamp: "[Users] FreeSWAN with kernel 2.4"
In reply to: Mimmus: "[Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Next in thread: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Reply: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Wednesday 08 May 2002 15:06, Mimmus wrote:
> I used a modem PPP connection to test FreeS/WAN with our company firewall
> (FW1).
> After getting and IP address, I configured things as we have a static IP
> address.
> All works well if I left unconfigured 'rightnexthop' parameter. Is it
> normal?
> What is the exact explanation?

If rightnexthop is not set, the assumption is that it is same as right, which
is true in your case.

Teemu

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Justin Kreger: "RE: [Users] FreeSWAN with kernel 2.4"
Previous message: Isamp: "[Users] FreeSWAN with kernel 2.4"
In reply to: Mimmus: "[Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Next in thread: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Reply: Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães: "Re: [Users] FreeS/WAN with PPP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST