Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] delete messages

From: Mike Ruhl (mruhl_at_cips.nokia.com)
Date: Thu May 09 2002 - 03:04:33 CEST

Next message: security-audit-request: "[Users] LANGUAGE"
Previous message: Carla Schroder: "Re: [Users] compiling error with 1.96 and 1.97"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Howdy,

I am doing some interoperablity work between FreeSwan and another
IPSec implenetation, and I noticed something that didn't seem quite
right.

Twas wondering if it had been discussed before.

When FreeSwan sends a delete message (ver. 1.97), to delete IPSec SAs,
it send protocol_id 50 (AH) and protocol_id 51 (ESP).

Since the domain of interpretation is IPSec, should it be
PROTO_IPSEC_AH (2) and PROTO_IPSEC_ESP (3)?

I am referencing page 42 of RFC 2408.

Thanks,

Mike

text/x-vcard attachment: Card for Mike Ruhl

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: security-audit-request: "[Users] LANGUAGE"
Previous message: Carla Schroder: "Re: [Users] compiling error with 1.96 and 1.97"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST