Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?

From: Marc Tinnemeyer (marc-web_at_gmx.net)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 16:28:58 CEST

Next message: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Previous message: John Hardin: "Re: [Users] viruses on the list"
Next in thread: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Nate Carlson: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Sean McAvoy: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In the past I usually put it directly into the kernel, so I would like
to know how you handle this. Did you experience any problems based on
first or second method ?

Thanks a lot for any comments

Regards

Marc
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Previous message: John Hardin: "Re: [Users] viruses on the list"
Next in thread: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Thomas Küpper: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Nate Carlson: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Reply: Sean McAvoy: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST