Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?

From: Sean McAvoy (sean.mcavoy_at_megawheels.com)
Date: Fri May 10 2002 - 18:48:16 CEST

Next message: Vasiliy Boulytchev: "Re: [Users] viruses on the list"
Previous message: Nate Carlson: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
In reply to: Marc Tinnemeyer: "[Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I usually build it as a module, but I am currently building VPN/Firewall
server and have chosen to disable kernel module support for extra
security.

On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 10:28, Marc Tinnemeyer wrote:
> In the past I usually put it directly into the kernel, so I would like
> to know how you handle this. Did you experience any problems based on
> first or second method ?
>
>
> Thanks a lot for any comments
>
> Regards
>
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
Sean McAvoy
Network Analyst
Megawheels Technologies Inc.
Phone: 416.360.8211
Fax:   416.360.1403
Cell:  416.616.6599
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Vasiliy Boulytchev: "Re: [Users] viruses on the list"
Previous message: Nate Carlson: "Re: [Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
In reply to: Marc Tinnemeyer: "[Users] Do you put ipsec directly into kernel or load it as module ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST