Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Multiple road warriors... thanks!

From: Swaminathan Natarajan (swami_at_netlab.uky.edu)
Date: Sat May 11 2002 - 23:27:22 CEST

Next message: Greg Conway: "[Users] force ipsec to resolve ipsec.conf again on an open tunnel?"
Previous message: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Multiple road warriors."
In reply to: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Multiple road warriors."
Next in thread: Swaminathan Natarajan: "[Users] route -- route already in use"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>
> This looks like "uniqueids" is set to yes. Check the manpage for
> "ipsec.conf" and look for that variable for more info. In short, make sure
> it is set to "no" (the default), so that new connections do not replace
> existing ones.
>
Thanks! that worked! I guess the statement
"each Road Warrior MUST have a different key or certificate",
in the FAQ, made me think different keys are necessary.

Thanks,
Swami.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Greg Conway: "[Users] force ipsec to resolve ipsec.conf again on an open tunnel?"
Previous message: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Multiple road warriors."
In reply to: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Multiple road warriors."
Next in thread: Swaminathan Natarajan: "[Users] route -- route already in use"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST