Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] ipsec0,1,2,3

From: Steve Elkins (sgelkins_at_nortelnetworks.com)
Date: Mon May 13 2002 - 21:26:54 CEST

Next message: Ralf G. R. Bergs: "Re: [Users] IPSec connection FreeS/WAN<->FreeS/WAN works, but NOT FS <-> WinXP"
Previous message: Steve Paras-Charlton: "RE: [Users] test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

How high can this go?

I'm looking at klips/net/ipsec/ipsec_tunnel.c and wondering if adding
more ipsec#'s is as simple as adding and registering more device
structs.

I'd like to have a few hundred. Anyone see a problem with this?

The reason I think I need to do this is that I want to run a traffic
tool via IPsec and I'll have lots of aliased IPs on a certain box.
Looking at ipsec.conf and 'ipsec tncfg' leads me to think it'll be
"ipsec1=eth0:1 ipsec2=eth0:2 ...", i.e., 1 ipsec device per interface,
no more no less.

Any advice at all on this matter will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Steve

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Ralf G. R. Bergs: "Re: [Users] IPSec connection FreeS/WAN<->FreeS/WAN works, but NOT FS <-> WinXP"
Previous message: Steve Paras-Charlton: "RE: [Users] test"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST