Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintec X4100

From: Florian Große-Coosmann (coosmann_at_home.self.de)
Date: Thu May 16 2002 - 15:59:01 CEST

Next message: Josep Llauradó Selvas: "[Users] Freeswan + Crypto patch"
Previous message: Markus Wernig: "Re: [Users] higher value for the ikelifetime"
Next in thread: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintec X4100"
Reply: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintec X4100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

We'd tried connecting Freeswan 1.95 as a Road Warrior to a
Bintec X4100 without success.

The X4100 has IPsec, a static IP address and already some
Windows clients using IPsec with preshared keys.

We could built up a connection with preshared keys and a FIXED
ipv4 address of the linux box.

Now we'd tried RSA signatures. We certificated them at the
linux box and uploaded them to the Bintec as "force trusted".

We can get as far as the authentification (which fails) when we
enter the ip address of the linux box as "Peer Address". We don't
get any handshake without supplying the ip address.

Does anybody have hints?

Thanks,
Florian

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Josep Llauradó Selvas: "[Users] Freeswan + Crypto patch"
Previous message: Markus Wernig: "Re: [Users] higher value for the ikelifetime"
Next in thread: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintec X4100"
Reply: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintec X4100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:02 CEST