Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintex X4100

From: Markus Koellner (smshomey_at_gmx.de)
Date: Fri May 24 2002 - 17:59:09 CEST

Next message: Claus Rosenberger: "Re: [Users] one connection for every x.509 certificate"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] one connection for every x.509 certificate"
In reply to: Florian Große-Coosmann: "[Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintex X4100"
Next in thread: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintex X4100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

>11:37:45 DEBUG/IPSEC: Can not get QM policy for
> ipv4_subnet(any:0,[0..7]=0.0.0.0/0) <->
> ipv4_subnet(any:0,[0..7]=199.99.99.2/32)

There is a mismatch in your left- and righsubnet configuration
in Bintec or Freeswan.

freeswan side:
rightsubnet=192.168.1.0/24 # afaik from previous mails
leftsubnet= # leave empty

bintec side:
you have to define a localnet (192.168.1.0/24) and
a remote address 0.0.0.0/0 (I'm not quiet sure with the remote address).

If you send me a full barf from the freeswan side and the tunnel configuration
from the bintec side i may help.

Bye
Markus

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Claus Rosenberger: "Re: [Users] one connection for every x.509 certificate"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] one connection for every x.509 certificate"
In reply to: Florian Große-Coosmann: "[Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintex X4100"
Next in thread: Markus Koellner: "Re: [Users] Freeswan connecting to Bintex X4100"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:06 CEST