Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Re: [Bugs] [patch] ipsec.secrets inconsistency on PSK key formats

From: D. Hugh Redelmeier (hugh_at_mimosa.com)
Date: Sun Jun 02 2002 - 08:50:03 CEST

Next message: D. Hugh Redelmeier: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto --nofork and filedescriptors"
Previous message: D. Hugh Redelmeier: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] ipsec auto still uses the old --rekeywindow whack option"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Right you are. Also ipsec_pluto(8) still referred to ipsec_atodata.

Thanks,

Hugh Redelmeier
hugh_at_mimosa.com voice: +1 416 482-8253

| Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 14:48:53 +0200
| From: Henrik Nordstrom <hno_at_marasystems.com>
| Reply-To: users_at_lists.freeswan.org
| To: bugs_at_lists.freeswan.org
| Subject: [Bugs] [patch] ipsec.secrets inconsistency on PSK key formats
|
| Yet one more small cleanup patch
|
| ipsec.secrets(5) refers to the old function ipsec_atodata(3) (no longer
| documented). Should refer to the new ipsec_ttodata(3).
|
| Also added a comment explaining that keys on ttodata() format is not enclosed
| in quotes. To me this was not entirely obvious without looking into the code.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: D. Hugh Redelmeier: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] pluto --nofork and filedescriptors"
Previous message: D. Hugh Redelmeier: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] ipsec auto still uses the old --rekeywindow whack option"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:09 CEST