Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's

From: D. Hugh Redelmeier (hugh_at_mimosa.com)
Date: Wed Jun 12 2002 - 23:55:49 CEST

Next message: Barry, Christopher: "[Users] RE: I too am having trouble with FreeS/WAN<->FW-1"
Previous message: David Gardi: "[Users] Sentinel does not get natted packets. HELP!"
In reply to: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Next in thread: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Reply: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

| From: Michael Richardson <mcr_at_sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

| You might even just be able to hack _startklips to add all of the aliases
| from eth0 to ipsec0, and specify "eth0=ipsec0" instead.

Is that the most appropriate way to do this? Is _startklips
user-serviceable? Isn't it likely to get blown away at the next
installation?

Hugh Redelmeier
hugh_at_mimosa.com voice: +1 416 482-8253

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Barry, Christopher: "[Users] RE: I too am having trouble with FreeS/WAN<->FW-1"
Previous message: David Gardi: "[Users] Sentinel does not get natted packets. HELP!"
In reply to: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Next in thread: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Reply: Michael Richardson: "[Users] Re: [Bugs] FS 1.97 and Virtual IP's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:14 CEST