Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Re: Multiple tunnels

From: Claudia Schmeing (claudia_at_freeswan.org)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 22:57:12 CEST

Next message: Christian Ericsson: "[Users] Have you tried the NAT traversal patch?"
Previous message: Henry Spencer: "[Users] Re: TOS -IPSec Implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hi Diego,

You ask,

> I'm working fine with one tunnel and I want to connect other location to the
> same server, What I need to do?

Well, it's the same principle. Start with a second "conn" connection
entry that is just like the first. Leave all the server end stuff the
same, and change the other stuff to match the second location.
Do this on both machines that will be the ends of your new connection.

Exchange RSA public keys or secrets as needed, just like you did the
first time.

For another way to manage multiple connections, see:

http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_snaps/CURRENT-SNAP/doc/quickstart-configs.html#modular.rw.client.

Cheers,

Claudia

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBPQ5NFHDIYXPDEHodAQHQyQP/R1BiGKNFx2212mzlQo8KJg8rqspYSl5C
t7eVuiz9hxKNrPN0v3urJO8cTqkT+DJBgTN2+eUp1CQNmOHcp9PuwEKOXo1+pECC
SmUyyKp4xg9yjhSwfZnYCXCMS5HHrvxTapgVcn+eXBqLB6fXwj9fgqdChw/wOnYV
oflymRbw/HI=
=M/73
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Christian Ericsson: "[Users] Have you tried the NAT traversal patch?"
Previous message: Henry Spencer: "[Users] Re: TOS -IPSec Implementation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:14 CEST