Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] a simple question about FreeS/WAN

From: Henry Spencer (henry_at_spsystems.net)
Date: Fri Jun 28 2002 - 19:32:30 CEST

Next message: preeves: "[Users] Fw:eager to see you"
Previous message: darron: "[Users] Fw:congratulations"
In reply to: Linas Vepstas: "Re: [Users] a simple question about FreeS/WAN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Linas Vepstas wrote:
> > The vpn gateway passes all traffic. it acts as a tunnel between
> > the two gateways, it does *not* do packet filtering...
>
> I was very very very wrong in stating the above. 'most' tunnels
> behave like this, but the ipsec/freeswan tunnel does not.

Correct -- IPsec tunnels have access controls. This is a mandatory part
of the IPsec specifications.

Henry Spencer
henry_at_spsystems.net

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: preeves: "[Users] Fw:eager to see you"
Previous message: darron: "[Users] Fw:congratulations"
In reply to: Linas Vepstas: "Re: [Users] a simple question about FreeS/WAN"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:17 CEST