Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist_at_jdimedia.nl)
Date: Sat Jul 13 2002 - 19:17:31 CEST

Next message: Varga Daniel (QI/RZS42) *: "RE: [Users] w2k error: "left=" not defined !"
Previous message: Dennis Ng: "[Users] How to detect ipsec connection is alive?"
In reply to: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

> with the upcoming version 0.9.14 of the X.509 patch you could define
> the policies for the three users as follows

Any beta code of 0.9.14 available ??

Regards,

Igmar

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Varga Daniel (QI/RZS42) *: "RE: [Users] w2k error: "left=" not defined !"
Previous message: Dennis Ng: "[Users] How to detect ipsec connection is alive?"
In reply to: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:23 CEST