Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint

From: Igmar Palsenberg (maillist_at_jdimedia.nl)
Date: Sun Jul 14 2002 - 18:45:12 CEST

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] MacOS X connectivity"
Previous message: l_amit_at_netvision.net.il: "[Users] compiling error 1.97(mips)"
In reply to: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

> 0.9.14 will be released next week.

About the Virtual IP stuff : Is this according the obsolete ike-config
draft ? Or is the IP hardcoded in the config ?

I'm considering if it is usefull to implement the ike-config draft, since
there aren't many client that understand DHCP over IPSEC.

Regards,

Igmar

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] MacOS X connectivity"
Previous message: l_amit_at_netvision.net.il: "[Users] compiling error 1.97(mips)"
In reply to: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Next in thread: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Reply: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:23 CEST