Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Next hop in different subnet and no defaultroute

From: Andreas Stelzl (astelzl_at_avitech.de)
Date: Mon Jul 15 2002 - 09:03:58 CEST

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Previous message: Steve Maroney: "Re: [Users] L2TP/IPSEC client released by Microsoft"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi folks!

I have to problem that I must specify a fix interface e.g. ipsec0=eth0
but have the nexthop in a different subnet. As I noticed, this
configuration does not work. Is there any workaround?

Thanks
Andy

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Equivalent to Location in Checkpoint"
Previous message: Steve Maroney: "Re: [Users] L2TP/IPSEC client released by Microsoft"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:23 CEST