Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] Configuration question

From: Adrian Blockus (ablockus_at_gmx.net)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 10:55:31 CEST

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Why freeswan instead of cisco/nortel"
Previous message: Jon Molin: "[Users] Why freeswan instead of cisco/nortel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,

after having played a few weeks with quite simple configurations, I want to implent now a more complex solution providing road warrior support and securing a private wireless LAN.

My idea is the following:

Is it possible to configure freeswan to establish tunnels over two different eth-devices??
Do I need the NAT-traversal patch to connect the private wireless LAN?

Thanks in advance,
Adrian Blockus

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Igmar Palsenberg: "Re: [Users] Why freeswan instead of cisco/nortel"
Previous message: Jon Molin: "[Users] Why freeswan instead of cisco/nortel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:23 CEST