IPv6 readyNote: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

AW: [Users] fragmentation

From: psnizek_at_belfin.ch
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 19:48:44 CEST


Hi

I once had a similar problem. What MTU size do you use?

Philipp

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Stephen J Bevan [mailto:stephen_at_etunnels.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2002 18:53
> An: shishirm_at_netscape.net
> Cc: users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> Betreff: [Users] fragmentation
>
>
> Shishir Mondal writes:
> > I got one inter-operatibility issue with FreeSwan IPSec and my
> > IPSec. I saw, if I ping larger packets fragmented across multiple
> > ethernet packets, it gives authentication error. (last few bytes
> > changed in the signature). Well, I will debug my code,
> :-P, but if any
> > info on the freeswan setting which can lead to this problem ?
>
> What gives an authentication error, FreeS/WAN or your IPsec?
> During the course of some work I've tested 1600 byte pings over an
> IPsec tunnel mode connection to FreeS/WAN from OpenBSD, FreeBSD,
> Solaris, Windows and FreeS/WAN. In all cases the (FreeS/WAN) receiver
> correctly re-assembled and decrypted the packets. I haven't tried
> with larger packets which would require more than two fragments so
> perhaps that explains the difference in our results?
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:23 CEST