Charles Mauch writes:
> Jul 17 13:36:12 superunit pluto[6805]: "superunit-terminus"[1] 168.156.242.177 # 4: route-host output: SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
> Jul 17 13:36:12 superunit pluto[6805]: "superunit-terminus"[1] 168.156.242.177 # 4: route-host output: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/_updown: `route add -net 168.156.242.177 netmask 255.255.255.255 dev ipsec0 gw 168.156.242.177' failed
This is trying to add a route to 168.156.242.177 via 168.156.242.177.
That isn't going to work. Since the box is identifying it self as
168.156.242.177 it would appear that it is the gw value that is wrong
i.e. the leftnexthop entry in your ipsec.conf is wrong. Do :-
$ route -n
and set leftnexthop to whatever the Gateway entry is for your 0.0.0.0
Destination.
> Maybe I'm daffy, but shouldn't a route to a host look something like route
> add -host instead of route add -net?
As long as the netmask is 255.255.255.255 (which it is) then -net is
means the same as -host.
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:24 CEST