Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

[Users] left & rightfirewall.

From: Arne Van Theemsche (arne.vantheemsche_at_xs4all.be)
Date: Tue Jul 23 2002 - 10:18:17 CEST

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] DynDNS, PGPNet, terminating connection"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "[Users] Re: Linux Virtual IP client (was Version 0.9.14 of X.509 patch released)"
Next in thread: Anders Larsen: "Re: [Users] left & rightfirewall."
Reply: Anders Larsen: "Re: [Users] left & rightfirewall."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi,

this may be weird, but I have something working, while the manual says it
should not work.

I have 2 linux boxes, each with freeswan, both doing MASQUERADING on the
LAN side. I wanted to connect the 2 LAN's to each other through freeswan,
I did not use left or rightfirewall, and it works.
So what's the use of those 2 options then?
One of the 2 freeswan's is even masqueraded itself after a cisco who does
static nat to the private IP of the WAN-side of the secure-gateway.

Arne

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] DynDNS, PGPNet, terminating connection"
Previous message: Andreas Steffen: "[Users] Re: Linux Virtual IP client (was Version 0.9.14 of X.509 patch released)"
Next in thread: Anders Larsen: "Re: [Users] left & rightfirewall."
Reply: Anders Larsen: "Re: [Users] left & rightfirewall."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:26 CEST