Note: This archive passes through spamassassin. Every mail marked with the subject "*****SPAM*****" has exceed a certain threshold of spam-like behaviour.

Re: [Users] ESP befor AH

From: B ($B5HF#1QL_at_(B)
Date: Thu Jul 04 2002 - 16:48:56 CEST

Next message: Paul Wouters: "Re: [Users] iptables rules.. is it ok?"
Previous message: JuanJo Ciarlante: "Re: [Users] Minimum requirements for a 100MB connection"
In reply to: Roland Bremer: "[Users] ESP befor AH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In article <3D24515F.9553310A_at_netcologne.de> (at Thu, 04 Jul 2002 15:45:03 +0200), Roland Bremer <rbremer_at_netcologne.de> says:

> First Authorisation by AH or first encryption with ESP and DES ??

encrypt the packet, then sign it.

--yoshfuji
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Next message: Paul Wouters: "Re: [Users] iptables rules.. is it ok?"
Previous message: JuanJo Ciarlante: "Re: [Users] Minimum requirements for a 100MB connection"
In reply to: Roland Bremer: "[Users] ESP befor AH"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 05:20:26 CEST