[Users] Freeswan behind firewall ??? is it possible ?

From: Patrick Lhermie (pl_at_interaction.ws)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 21:20:05 CEST

• Next message: Andreas Steffen: "[Users] Re: missing cacerts, crls, x509cert.der, pgpcert.pgp"
• Previous message: Adam H. Pendleton: "[Users] RedHat 7.3 and lndir"
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Freeswan behind firewall ??? is it possible ?"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Freeswan behind firewall ??? is it possible ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,

I'm very new to vpn and I'm confused by all docs, howtos, etc...

Is it possible to have freeswan on linux box with only one ethernet
card. All docs refers to a firewall/freeswan combo, ie a gateway with 2
or more ethernet cards.
And in most cases, it also refers to a network to network VPN
configuration.

I just want to have an host to network configuration and why not, a
separate VPN host from firewall.

Something like this:
LAN---------FW---INTERNET--------HOST somewhere (telecommuters...)
      |
     VPN

If this is possible, where is VPN host ? DMZ ? LAN ?

Thanks for all answers!
Patrick.

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Andreas Steffen: "[Users] Re: missing cacerts, crls, x509cert.der, pgpcert.pgp"
• Previous message: Adam H. Pendleton: "[Users] RedHat 7.3 and lndir"
• Next in thread: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Freeswan behind firewall ??? is it possible ?"
• Reply: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Freeswan behind firewall ??? is it possible ?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:34 CEST