From: John A. Sullivan III (John.Sullivan_at_nexusmgmt.com)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 23:54:06 CEST
After reading all the documentation, I am a little confused about the
differences between the recent additions to the X.509 patch at
www.strongsec.com and the NAT-T patch at open-source.arkoon.net. The
X.509 patch appears to enable the DHCP-over-IPSec and I thought it
implemented NAT-T but I don't see much about the NAT-T in the docs.
Does it do the encapsulation in UDP or is that what the arkoon patch is
for? Where does one use one vs. the other? Thanks - John
-- John A. Sullivan III Group Technology Director Nexus Management +1 207-985-7880 John.Sullivan_at_nexusmgmt.com_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users_at_lists.freeswan.org http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:34 CEST