From: mlafon_at_arkoon.net
Date: Wed Jul 31 2002 - 09:26:14 CEST
> After reading all the documentation, I am a little confused about the
> differences between the recent additions to the X.509 patch at
> www.strongsec.com and the NAT-T patch at open-source.arkoon.net. The
> X.509 patch appears to enable the DHCP-over-IPSec and I thought it
> implemented NAT-T but I don't see much about the NAT-T in the docs.
> Does it do the encapsulation in UDP or is that what the arkoon patch is
> for? Where does one use one vs. the other? Thanks - John
No, the X.509 patch does not implement NAT-T. For NAT-T, you must use
the patch available at open-source.arkoon.net.
If you (or others) want to test NAT-T, i attach the current bugfix patch
for NAT-T 0.2. Please apply it (above NAT-T 0.2) before reporting any
bugs.
(See attached file: pluto_NAT-T_0.2_020717.diff)
-- Mathieu Lafon - Arkoon Network Security
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users_at_lists.freeswan.org http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:34 CEST