From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.net)
Date: Wed Jul 31 2002 - 13:17:50 CEST
I don't know if it works the other way around. Just try it!
Andreas
John A. Sullivan III wrote:
> So then do we apply the NAT-T patch first or are they just completely
> incompatible? Thanks - John
>
> On Wed, 2002-07-31 at 06:19, Andreas Steffen wrote:
>
>>It just means that the NAT-T patch cannot be successfully applied
>>after the X.509 patch since one or several hunks will fail due to
>>the[right/left]subnetwithin feature introduced by the X.509 patch.
>>
>>Andreas
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH phone: +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Zürichweg 20 home: http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
==========================================[strong internet security]==
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:34 CEST