From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.net)
Date: Thu Aug 01 2002 - 00:10:45 CEST
Norbert Wegener wrote:
> Hello Andreas,
>
> first of all: Thanks for the explanation.
>
> Andreas Steffen schrieb:
>
>>Well, if you have set keylife=24h then it is just normal behaviour
>>to keep the eroute for at least this time frame. The problem
>>will always occur when a different user logs in with an IP
>>for which an eroute is still in use.
>
>
> But another question arises: Why can the existing eroute not be taken
> down in this case?
Ask the FreeS/WAN team! But usually you don't throw out an incumbent
president while he is still in office ;-)
> If you have a limited pool of ipaddresses for your customers and no
> client with delete notification, you will probably run in a problem like
> this one.
>
> Regards
> Norbert
>
Regards
Andreas
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH phone: +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Zürichweg 20 home: http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
==========================================[strong internet security]==
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:35 CEST