*****SPAM***** Re: [Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?

From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.net)
Date: Fri Aug 02 2002 - 15:01:20 CEST

• Next message: Henning Riis Rasmussen: "RE: [Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Previous message: eugen.d.jeggle_at_accenture.com: "[Users] VPN Tunnel Basics - HELP"
• In reply to: Henning Riis Rasmussen: "[Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Next in thread: mlafon_at_arkoon.net: "Re: [Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
SPAM:
SPAM: Content analysis details: (5.2 hits, 5 required)
SPAM: SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK (-0.1 points) Subject: ends in a question mark
SPAM: DOUBLE_CAPSWORD (1.1 points) BODY: A word in all caps repeated on the line
SPAM: MIME_EXCESSIVE_QP (2.4 points) RAW: Excessive quoted-printable encoding in body
SPAM: NO_MX_FOR_FROM (1.8 points) No MX records for the From: domain
SPAM:
SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------

Just compare the Peer ID you receive with the Peer ID's in
your defined connections (ipsec auto --status). If there is no
match then you must change your connection definitions
accordingly.

Regards

Andreas

Henning Riis Rasmussen wrote:
> Hi all
>=20
> I've spend a lot of time trying to make the NAT-T v0.2 patch work with
> NAT'ed roadwarriors (Sentinel 1.3.2 on Windows 2000), using preshard ke=
ys.
>=20
> No matter what i try I end up with the following PLUTO error: "no suita=
ble
> connection for peer" after the Peer ID has been received.
>=20
> Has anybody had luck with this?
>=20
> Regards,
> Henning

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH phone: +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Z=FCrichweg 20 home: http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D[strong internet secur=
ity]=3D=3D

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Henning Riis Rasmussen: "RE: [Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Previous message: eugen.d.jeggle_at_accenture.com: "[Users] VPN Tunnel Basics - HELP"
• In reply to: Henning Riis Rasmussen: "[Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Next in thread: mlafon_at_arkoon.net: "Re: [Users] Is the Arkoon NAT-T 0.2 patch actually working?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 21:01:35 CEST