From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.net)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 11:24:15 CEST
It is more structural. Juanjo Ciarlante's AES patches renames the
two struct member variables hmac_digest_len and hash_digest_len
into hmac_digest_size and hash_digest_len, respectively. Since
these variables are referenced in Mathieu Lafon's patch, some
hunks fail. You can try to rename the variables from *_len to
*_size in the delete_notify patch. It may work then.
Regards
Andreas
Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
>>I'm using freeswan-1.98b with x509patch-0.9.14 and aes-0.8.0.
>>Currently the only drawback is that Mathieu Lafon's delete-notify
>>patch cannot be applied in the presence of the AES patch.
>
>
> Is this a simple matter of a hunk failing, or is it more structural ?? I'm
> gonna probably need both for a project I'm on now.
>
>
>
> Igmar
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH phone: +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Zürichweg 20 home: http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
==========================================[strong internet security]==
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 08 2002 - 15:19:33 CEST