From: Ken Bantoft (ken_at_networkoverlord.com)
Date: Thu Aug 08 2002 - 15:42:31 CEST
Good plan... done.
Is there a demand for prepatched "super" freeswan's I wonder?
I supply prepatched .tar.gz and RH RPMs with the X.509 patches already,
and according to freeswan.ca weblog, they are more popular than the stock
FreeS/WAN. I'm wondering if there's any value in adding in the DeleteSA
and AES patches too.
Ken
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Andreas Steffen wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reaction :)
>
> It might be safer to rename the name of the patch to
>
> notify_delete-freeswan-1.98b-aes-0.8.0.diff.gz
>
> since the variable name changes were introduced with
> version 0.8.0 of the AES patches.
>
> Regards
>
> Andreas
>
> Ken Bantoft wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Andreas Steffen wrote:
> >
> >
> >>As I recommended to Igmar Palsenberg a couple of minutes ago
> >>I replaced hmac_digest_len and hash_digest_len in Mathieu Lafon's
> >>patch with hmach_digest_size and hash_digest_size, respectively
> >>and I was able to apply the notify_delete patch after JuanJo
> >>Ciarlante's AES patches. I was able to get Pluto up and running.
> >>I will report any long-term problems but I don't expect any.
> >>
> >>I append the modified notify_delete patch to this mail.
> >>Ken Bantoft might add it to his fine FreeS/WAN mirror site.
> >
> >
> > Done... http://www.freeswan.ca/patches/ & thanks.
> >
> > Hopefully both with be in v2.00, but that's up to the developers.
> >
> > Ken
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Aug 08 2002 - 19:19:32 CEST