Re: [Users] Does FS 1.95 work on 2.4.18/RH 7.3

From: Sam Sgro (sam_at_freeswan.org)
Date: Fri Aug 16 2002 - 21:13:42 CEST

• Next message: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] connection attempt not mine"
• Previous message: Thomas Will: "[Users] freeswan-x509 <-> freeswan-x509"
• In reply to: Adam Khan: "[Users] Does FS 1.95 work on 2.4.18/RH 7.3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

That information is heavily out of date; the most recent stable release is
FreeS/WAN 1.98b. You can find RedHat RPMs here:

ftp://ftp.xs4all.nl/pub/crypto/freeswan/RedHat-RPMs

and here:

http://www.freeswan.ca/download.php

Sam Sgro
sam_at_freeswan.org

On Fri, 16 Aug 2002, Adam Khan wrote:

> The FreeSWAN webpage state that the current release is 1.95.
> Why is not 1.96/1.97? I assume stability etc.
>
> On http://www.freeswan.ca/code/old the recommendation is
> at least 1.96 for RH 7.3.
> Has anyone successfully installed FS 1.95 on RedHat 7.3?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv
Comment: For the matching public key, finger the Reply-To: address.

iQCVAwUBPV1O6EOSC4btEQUtAQFTdgP+I9i6YeWfBLkynvvA2PRcp0RwB34rTM1p
bbCEsuvtxdXdkxjqMi4/7aw8oP2eSRii8AQUfwdA/YoEIWHH8VG79lyQgI7i9b1Z
ntNuoql6z2I9l0GUBsWCgfeBkNDf5xDlplRCgRmbzFf/h1HGncmemD4ILsVaWGkT
4VCPTKC3EiQ=
=ldJH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

• Next message: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] connection attempt not mine"
• Previous message: Thomas Will: "[Users] freeswan-x509 <-> freeswan-x509"
• In reply to: Adam Khan: "[Users] Does FS 1.95 work on 2.4.18/RH 7.3"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Aug 17 2002 - 00:19:43 CEST