Re: [Users] Can we close the FreeS/WAN list to non-subscribers?

From: Markus Koellner (smshomey_at_gmx.de)
Date: Fri Aug 23 2002 - 19:52:18 CEST

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] freeswan-x509 <--> Check Point VPN-1 NG FP-2"
Previous message: Alistair Nelson: "FW: [Users] Newbie: Following Nate Carlsons document..."
In reply to: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Can we close the FreeS/WAN list to non-subscribers?"
Next in thread: Reimer, Fred: "RE: [Users] Can we close the FreeS/WAN list to non-subscribers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I agree with the list maintainers not to close this list for
non-subscribers. I respect this decision!

But what about disabling attachments on the list ?
This would hold back this many virus mails with Klez and all
the others as attachments!

It would also not be forbidden sending "ipsec barf" or other log
files because this can be sent as text within the mail.

( just another spam mail ;-) )

Bye
Markus

Next message: Andreas Steffen: "Re: [Users] freeswan-x509 <--> Check Point VPN-1 NG FP-2"
Previous message: Alistair Nelson: "FW: [Users] Newbie: Following Nate Carlsons document..."
In reply to: Sam Sgro: "Re: [Users] Can we close the FreeS/WAN list to non-subscribers?"
Next in thread: Reimer, Fred: "RE: [Users] Can we close the FreeS/WAN list to non-subscribers?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Aug 23 2002 - 23:19:49 CEST