[Users] ipsec over static dialup

From: Mat Harris (mat.harris_at_genestate.com)
Date: Tue Sep 10 2002 - 23:24:28 CEST

• Next message: Graham Wood: "Re: [Users] Is a VPN appliance better than FreeS/WAN for an ADSL at home?"
• Previous message: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] Windows with x509 and Normal Freeswan To Freeswan Conection"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

i use freeswan quite extensively at work over adsl lines, but now i want
to link my home network to my lab at the office. problem is that i
cannot get adsl at home, only isdn.

i have creating the connection just the same but set the ipsec0
interface to ippp0 instead of eth1 (the usual settign for out systems).

now when i try to connect from the isdn end, i get the followign
message:

022 "neston-lab": we have no ipsecN interface for either end of this
connection

I have a static dialup on my isdn and have put the nexthops in just fine
(my usual slipup point)

let me know if i should post barfs and ipsec.confs on the net or if it's
a quick fix.

cheers

-- 
Mat Harris			OpenGPG Public Key ID: CC14DD34
mat.harris_at_genestate.com	matthewh.genestate.com	

• application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

• Next message: Graham Wood: "Re: [Users] Is a VPN appliance better than FreeS/WAN for an ADSL at home?"
• Previous message: Ken Bantoft: "Re: [Users] Windows with x509 and Normal Freeswan To Freeswan Conection"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Sep 11 2002 - 05:19:58 CEST