From: Vic Berdin (vic_at_digi.com.ph)
Date: Wed Sep 11 2002 - 11:31:10 CEST
Hello everyone,
Upon initiating the "ipsec rsasigkey 1024" command , I get a "pubkey"
format that is different from that of the examples I gather from the
docs.
For some reason, perhaps due to this "pubkey" value, I can't establish a
successful subnet-to-subnet VPN. Below is a snip of my generated
"pubkey" value.
# RSA 1024 bits SR3K-VPN1 Tue Sep 10 11:53:55 2002
# for signatures only, UNSAFE FOR ENCRYPTION
#pubkey=0sAQNnQtCrwTIPX9+lBMZuGzaYulXNzFFlZmAC0HVPO19mqJd2Gbt38OLLp/nBFY
PyW+p+CKeoIVuWV7nxIZz/KovwQ4gmh3Ec3SUVFuQtRZY+htOWh28m5iaiIsH+w+TCxT3pdL
Jq+ScnrpZCOOQUhFaZVHUJB8B4tDbjEO9LMYt8UQ==
#IN KEY 0x4200 4 1
AQNnQtCrwTIPX9+lBMZuGzaYulXNzFFlZmAC0HVPO19mqJd2Gbt38OLLp/nBFYPyW+p+CKeo
IVuWV7nxIZz/KovwQ4gmh3Ec3SUVFuQtRZY+htOWh28m5iaiIsH+w+TCxT3pdLJq+ScnrpZC
OOQUhFaZVHUJB8B4tDbjEO9LMYt8UQ==
# (0x4200 = auth-only host-level, 4 = IPSec, 1 = RSA)
......
......
To my understanding, I should get a pubkey that starts with 0x....?
Is there really something wrong with my "pubkey" above? I would also
like to
send out parts of my "ipsec barf" result if there's nothing wrong with
my "pubkey".
TIA
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 12 2002 - 05:20:02 CEST