From: Keith Morse (kgmorse_at_mpcu.com)
Date: Thu Sep 19 2002 - 00:47:34 CEST
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Ken Bantoft wrote:
[some usefull tidbits that I snipped]
Ummm, okay. What then would be the syntax for the following:
172.16.64.254 206.135.182.200 192.168.64.254
=============fw********internet******fw----------------fw===========
68.67.15.150 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.12
one-to-one nat
I hope the above make sense.
68.67.15.150 206.135.182.200: PSK "0x948bfbe77c59d9b51278c51d1793e13297b92f44ba665f43"
or
68.67.15.150 192.168.1.12: PSK "0x948bfbe77c59d9b51278c51d1793e13297b92f44ba665f43"
? Or does it matter?
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Sep 19 2002 - 05:20:10 CEST