Re: [Users] X509 and RSA

From: Andreas Steffen (andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.net)
Date: Sun Sep 29 2002 - 01:05:47 CEST


You most probably have version 0.9.9 of the X.509 patch for freeswan-1.96.
You must upgrade to a least version 0.9.12 which introduced the new
configuration parameter

   nocrsend=yes

in the setup section of ipsec.conf. This parameter suppresses the
sending of certificate request on which standard FreeS/WAN used to choke.

Regards

Andreas

Doug Leece wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have never seen this explicitly defined so I am hoping someone in the
> group can confirm the results I am getting are normal. Is it possible to
> have connections secured by x509 certificates and other connections
> secured with RSA. Currently every time I add the X509 certificates the
> tunnels that were working fine with RSA only now fail to create an SA. I
> am running 1.96 on both ends of the tunnels, trying to get Win2k boxes
> to connect in as road warriors with x509 authentiation.
>
> If someone has this working not only am I impressed I would like to see
> how you built your ipsec.conf file and would also like to know what
> version of Freeswan and 509 patch did the trick.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Doug Leece
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
> http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

-- 
======================================================================
Andreas Steffen                 e-mail: andreas.steffen_at_strongsec.com
strongSec GmbH                  phone:  +41 76 340 25 56
Alter Zürichweg 20              home:   http://www.strongsec.com
CH-8952 Schlieren (Switzerland)
==========================================[strong internet security]==
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users_at_lists.freeswan.org
http://lists.freeswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 29 2002 - 05:20:17 CEST